the problem that many franchise

[MasudIbne756]

For example, a network that has 30 points of sale but where the parent company does not earn and the majority of franchisees are at the break-even threshold and therefore at the point of covering expenses, should be considered a start-up franchise.

It is therefore necessary, when we are faced with a start-up franchise, to have a priority: to open so that a franchisee remains open, and not simply to sell an affiliation.

In fact, networks have is precisely that of opening as many outlets teacher data as possible, because it is the great dream of an entrepreneur. But this makes the network unproductive, because you would not be able to manage it from the beginning with high standards, and this will certainly create problems.

Also, there is no need to open too far from where you have your parent company! For example, if the franchisee wants to open in Puglia, but the parent company is in Venice, if there is a problem, the franchisor will have to take a whole day or even stay overnight to reach the affiliate in difficulty.

But what does this mean?
Does it mean that if the network develops too quickly by opening one affiliation after another, when two problems arise at the same time in two very distant points from the franchisor, what do you do?