Where does this leave the grand and petit juries?

[samiaseo222]

It is important to understand that grand and petit juries are the absolute cornerstone of English common law. That is why the forces of tyranny have worked so diligently to gain control of these juries. Some judges have gone so far as to make jurors sign a paper that demands obedience to the judge (judges who attempt to compromise the integrity of a jury in this manner should be taken before the grand jury).

In previous decades the courts knew they had no legal authority over juries and Citizens were taught their rights and responsibilities as jury members. However, children are no longer taught the importance of jury duty and grow up believing that jury duty is an obligation that should be avoided at all costs. The courts and prosecutors have taken full advantage of this omission of civic power and responsibility from public instruction by usurping the people's grand and petit jury authority -- and have managed to turn it against them.

A fully informed and functioning jury as provided in the phone number list Magna Carta and the original Constitution was the five-strand barbed wire fence between Citizens and intrusive government. Modern juries are the same fence laying on the ground because the fenceposts were allowed to rot.

The corporation's legal system has determined that it is their right to instruct juries, influence their decisions and determine whether or not grand juries should be convened to bring charges against certain individuals. Officers of the court can quote innumerable cases where judges have upheld their right to control juries. Indeed, it is a standard practice that juries receive their instruction from the judge before a trial so that they can be told how they are to arrive at a decision.